The Political Fault Line: Politics, Obesity, & COVID
How Biology, Behavior and Belief Systems Collided
COVID was a bewildering and divisive time. Health became politicized like never before. Institutions lost trust. And the underlying conditions of American health - or the lack of it - were laid bare.
Whatever one believes about the vaccine, most of us can agree on one thing: America did not fare well.
More than 1.2 million Americans have died with COVID-19 listed as a cause of death. Excess-mortality analyses suggest the true toll is even higher. When adjusted for population size, the United States ranks among the top 20 countries globally for the COVID death rate. How did a wealthy nation with extraordinary medical resources end up in such a sorry state?
Early in the pandemic, one pattern was unmistakable. Severe COVID was strongly correlated with age and with metabolic conditions like obesity and diabetes. A JAMA paper published in April 2020 (barely a month after lockdown) demonstrated that the virus disproportionately harmed older adults and those with preexisting metabolic disease.
Then came the vaccine. When Trump launched Operation Warp Speed in 2020, the initiative received broad bipartisan support. But as the months unfolded, the vaccine - especially the mRNA Pfizer and Moderna varietals - became a political and cultural fault line. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation COVID-19 Vaccine Monitor, 91% of Democrats reported receiving a COVID vaccine, compared with only 66% of Republicans.
As the virus mutated, the vaccine (given that it was engineered for the ancestral strain) became less effective at blocking infection and transmission. Side effects such as myocarditis captured public attention. This led to growing vaccine skepticism on the political right.
At the same time, the overwhelming weight of evidence continued to show strong protection against hospitalization and death. The Biden Administration and liberal media dug in their heels in support of the vaccine. Increasingly, this cleavage became more and more profound and intractable – leading to arguably the deepest political schism since civil rights.
Trying to keep up with the shifting ground, I found myself returning to a simple instinctive hypothesis:
What if the people at the highest metabolic risk were also the least likely to get vaccinated?
What if these two vulnerabilities - biological and behavioral - overlapped?
And what if that convergence shaped America’s pandemic outcome?
That question sent me down a long data rabbit hole. I pulled state-level data from the CDC and other official sources to create a four-tab spreadsheet:
COVID mortality rate
Obesity prevalence
Vaccination rate
2020 presidential vote share
(I eventually also look at median household income by state)
I used Excel to plot the data on a series of maps. The maps and correlations I created do not represent an epidemiological study. They don’t establish causation, control for confounders, or assess individual-level risk. This project is a descriptive, population-level exploration meant to surface patterns and generate better questions.
Here’s what emerged:
1. Higher vaccination rates are associated with lower COVID death rates. States with greater vaccine uptake tended to see fewer deaths per capita.
2. Lower obesity rates are associated with lower COVID death rates. Leaner states fared better.
3. Higher obesity rates are associated with lower vaccination rates. The most obese states were often the least vaccinated.
These relationships don’t exist in isolation. They sit inside layers of culture, behavior, and policy.
Obesity, vaccination, and COVID mortality are not independent variables. They’re downstream of deeper forces, including long-standing health behaviors, trust in institutions, access to healthcare, socioeconomic stress, political identity, and media ecosystems.
Many of the states with higher obesity rates are more politically conservative, and those same states had lower vaccine uptake. This consilience resulted in devastating results in the Southeast, including Tennessee, West Virginia, Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana, as well as Oklahoma and Wyoming.
Politics didn’t cause obesity. Politics didn’t cause COVID. But political identity strongly influenced health behavior during the pandemic, especially around vaccination.
During COVID, vaccination became a proxy for trust, a symbol of autonomy vs. authority, and a cultural signal as much as a medical intervention. Those cultural forces shaped vaccine adoption, which then interacted with underlying metabolic risk.
The takeaway isn’t that one factor explains COVID outcomes. It’s that biology, behavior, and belief systems are aligned in ways that make some populations far more vulnerable than others.
COVID didn’t just expose a virus problem. It exposed a metabolic health problem, a trust problem and a cultural coherence problem - all at once.
One of the most frustrating aspects of COVID, for me, was that we squandered a historic opportunity to teach basic virology to the public. Anyone familiar with evolutionary biology understands that a vaccine built for the ancestral strain would become less effective over time because respiratory viruses mutate quickly. Yet this simple, foundational point was rarely communicated.
We also missed a chance to improve the underlying conditions of American health. From the very beginning, we knew that COVID disproportionately harmed people with metabolic dysfunction, but there was no large-scale governmental effort to strengthen metabolic resilience or to promote lifestyle interventions. Instead, some of the most visible incentives—like Krispy Kreme’s free-donut campaign for the newly vaccinated—ran in the opposite direction.
In some ways, SARS-CoV-2 created an imperfect storm for public health: a virus with a relatively high reproduction rate but a relatively low mortality rate. In practical terms, it infected many people while killing a comparatively small percentage of them. That dynamic left many individuals, including myself, feeling less urgency around vaccination. My concern is that this complacency sets the stage for a far more dangerous epidemic.
We now have a population with significant metabolic vulnerability and a growing distrust of medical interventions, distrust that is increasingly tied to political identity. What happens if a virus arrives with a 20 percent mortality rate?
That is the question that should keep us up at night.
🎧 You can also watch The Commune Podcast, where I speak with a wide range of luminaries, including Andrew Huberman, Marianne Williamson, Matthew McConaughey, and Gabor Maté about purpose, health, and human potential. Listen ad-free with a paid subscription.
Upcoming Events:
Special pricing to join me and Schuyler in Baja!
If winter has you feeling sluggish or off balance, this is an invitation to reset. While much of the country is deep in the cold, we’ll be in Baja, Mexico, February 2 to 7, 2026, working with warmth, movement, and recovery.
Kickstart Your Longevity in 2026 is a five day immersive retreat focused on energy, resilience, and metabolic health. We’ll use thermal therapies, breathwork, and mindful movement, and you’ll leave with a personalized longevity blueprint you can actually use back home.Join me for The Perfect Weekend, three days to reset your habits and align your lifestyle with your human design. April 10-12 and May 29-31, 2026, in Topanga, CA.
Want to Go Deeper Into Your Mind-Body Alignment?
If today’s essay resonated, you’ll love my Cultivating Inner Peace course—available to all paid Substack subscribers. 10 powerfully simple meditations for navigating turbulent times.
👉 Become a paid subscriber to unlock the course and more.
If you’re already a paid subscriber, you can start the course.
You've made a few mistake that I'd like to call your attention to. When you stated that the vaccine "became less effective at blocking infection and transmission" as the virus mutated" , that was inaccurate. If you were to read the Pfizer clinical trial documents, you would realize that the vaccine was never tested for nor expected to prevent transmission nor did it actually block infection. The information we received was the "relative" efficacy of the vaccine which stated it was 95% effective. The absolute efficacy was less than 1%. Who would have taken an experimental gene therapy injection if it was <1 % effective on a population level. First step was changing the long standing definition of what a "vaccine" actually was. DONE. The FDA had previously stated that it was essential for the general public to receive both measures in order to obtain true informed consent. That very conclusion has been removed from public view.
Another issue is that we didn't "squander a historic opportunity to teach basic virology to the public". The powers that be intentionally censored those brave physicians and researchers who did everything in their power to get the message out to the public. We were prevented from providing life saving information. One only has to look at the Great Barrington Declaration to see the international outcry for a different path through the pandemic - which turned out to be 100 correct actually. The same can be said of early treatment options which were also maligned and censored.
Now are you ready for the final assault on the truth......If you died within 14 days of vaccination, your death was noted that you were unvaccinated. Most vaccine deaths occurred within 48 hours of the vaccination. The deep dive into CDC data was essentially worthless as you likely know - garbage in- garbage out.
Perhaps you were trying not to ruffle too many feathers, but if your goal was to speak the truth, you missed the mark by a few key points I'm afraid. Some points were well said but what was left out was quite important if we're going to learn the lessons that Covid was meant to teach us. If we fail to learn important life lessons, we'll be given an opportunity to do so yet again.
Really compelling data visualization here. The convergence you mapped between metabolic vulnerabilty, vaccine hesitancy, and political identity is exactly the kind of systems-level thinking we needed during the pandemic. I worked in public health data and saw similar patterns but nobody wanted to talk about the metabolic baseline publicly, felt like adressing it was seen as victim-blaming or something.